The Purpose(s) of Reading Classes?

Today (actually yesterday and today) was tough and I left school feeling frustrated and dejected and wondering: What is the purpose(s) of reading classes in high school according to (a) state leaders, (b) district leaders, (c) school leaders, (d) fellow reading teachers, and (e) our students? In our district--and I am assuming across the state--we have two mandated "programs" (curriculum) that we are supposed to use. One is text based and groups two titles together (short story and poem, short story and interview, non-fiction essay with poem, etc.). We are supposed to take 4 weeks to cover each group--yes, four weeks to cover a short story and poem! Along with this "curriculum" we have a computer-based "curriculum" where students are assessed and then receive several articles to read each week (based on their lexile scores) and then answer multiple choice questions for. Both of these "programs" are expected to be used as 20-23 minute rotations/literacy centers along with whatever else we deem necessary/suitable for our students on a daily basis. Of course, leaders know that daily rotations are not always possible. Students, at least those in grades 11-12, are placed in these reading classes because they failed the mandated state graduation exam. They stay in reading classes until they pass this exam. There are also reading classes for 9th and 10th grade students--to be honest, I don't know what "scores" or "data" is used to make this decision. There are three different levels of reading classes depending on how (poorly) the student did on the high-stakes test. I have mid-level 11th and 12th graders. Today, in our department meeting, we were shown a graph of each teachers' students' progress on the computer-based program. Even though we all have different levels of students and grade levels of students (who have very different attendance patterns and levels of motivation) this chart was shown to all. Now, it was prefaced with "this is not meant to . . ." (as in embarrass, chastise, etc.). However, that is exactly what it did.

As you can see, I am at the bottom of this list. This computer program is just one component of a full reading class. What about the rest? Average data was used to compare teachers and their students. My dejected and often truant upperclassmen were compared to 9th grade students who are reading at higher levels. A teacher with one class of students was compared to another who teaches three classes. To pass out this chart serves what purpose? Is it to motivate us? Is it to tell us that we need to somehow get our kids to score above 75%? (I asked, frankly, how to do this. I talk about the importance of a 75% or higher every time we do it. What is there to truly motivate the kids to do it?) Where is the quality/quantity balance? (Because we were also given charts that show EVERYONE'S total usage). So what am I left wondering?: What about how much students love or hate to read? What about the other things we do that a computer program does not capture? What about the pressure to help them pass this stupid state graduation exam? What about the ones who have taken it (sometimes three times already) and failed every time? What about my dual language speakers who need so much more than I have time to give them? What about my kids who can't put books down they are so good? What about the kids who never come to class and thus ruin my "average"? What about reading in general? Do people really care?